On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:43:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >I'm sure this is already on someone's todo list but at least those must >go away for shim and shim-signed to be testing candidates: > > kibi@tokyo:~$ rmadison shim shim-signed -s unstable -a i386 -S > shim-signed | 1.40+15.7-1 | unstable | i386 > shim-unsigned | 15.7-1 | unstable | i386 > >(I haven't seen any bug against ftp.debian.org)
Nod, we already know about this. But thanks for checking and reminding me! :-) >A cursory look at the tracker pages for both suggests an explicit >approval is required anyway (to have both updated in lockstep), see >ivodd's hints file. ACK. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "I used to be the first kid on the block wanting a cranial implant, now I want to be the first with a cranial firewall. " -- Charlie Stross
