Control: tags -1 + unreproducible
allan <[email protected]> wrote (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:32:16 -0600): > I'm afraid not - I downloaded it from debian.org's homepage this morning.. So this bug would need to be tagged 'unreproducible' since it looks completely different here: 5,5GB of swap on a QEMU VM with 12GB of RAM and 100GB harddrive. > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:28 PM Holger Wansing <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > allan <[email protected]> wrote (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:06:35 -0600): > > > This screenshot is another VM install I just started - I allocated > > > 12GB RAM and 100GB disk - note swap is still set at 1GB - > > > > I guess you used the old installation image from 3 months ago for this > > test... > > > > Holger > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 9:56 AM allan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 9:40 AM Holger Wansing <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Testing like this is perfectly fine :-) > > > > > > > > > > However: > > > > > 20G is a rather small disk these days for a workstation with a > > > > > graphical > > > > > deskop. > > > > > For example, when I test it with a 35G harddrive, I get 2G of swap > > > > > partition. > > > > > > > > > > How much RAM has your machine? > > > > > > > > I did it on QEMU/KVM and allocated 8GB. Still, if default hibernation > > > > image is up to 2/5 of installed RAM a 1GB swap partition could be > > > > insufficient. > > > > > > > > I think the algorithm that allocates swap space might need a look. I > > > > can't prove it because the installation no longer exists but I saw > > > > that same 1GB swap partition about three months ago when installing to > > > > a 240GB external drive on a machine with 8GB RAM. > > > > > > -- > > Holger Wansing <[email protected]> > > PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076 -- Holger Wansing <[email protected]> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
