On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:33:00PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 10:45:35AM: > > > On CD *1*? Surely you don't plan to introduce new features in such a core > > component mere weeks before the scheduled release? There is no way that it > > Why not? Weeks != days.
10 days != long enough to test a completely different _primary_ way of booting the installation system. > Why not use _exactly_ this on the first CD, and pure idepci on 5th CD (for > the few cases where isolinux may break though I have _never_ heard about > problems with isolinux). Sure, once it has been proven to work _for Debian_ on a wide variety of systems. It would have been a great idea a couple of months ago. Why did you wait until there was so much pressure to finish the release? > And sorry, IMHO is idepci the worst kernel-image to be used for CD#1 as > the only available flavor. It seems to work for a large number of users, and that is its only job, is it not? -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]