On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:42:36AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > That's pretty much the point of this thread. Besides some obvious stuff, > I don't really know what we should aim for, and hope some people tell > me. :-)
Ok, that works for me :-) As for discover2, I'm still sticking with just using discover1 for d-i, unless we can really get discover2 in good shape quickly. For me, it takes a lot of the stress away if we can just stick with discover1 for now, and work towards discover2 eventually. I would very much like to get discover2 in to sid so we can see just how it holds up, in which case it might be a good idea to try it in d-i, but as of now it's really a question mark as I see it. Gaudenz may have other ideas, since he's the one who's actually done all the work on discover2. I really just want to get this thing out though, so sticking with discover1 makes that a bit easier :-) - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]