Please ignore last mail, IM get's me used to ctrl+enter.

        Re: http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/

I'd suggest the first one of these as it is the more consistent with the
Debian logo and graphics in general. We already use the logo, and the
pink/red colour as a distinguishable look for leaflets handed out at
expos and for Debian merchandising. For a professional look, which even
a non-professional distro would do well to strive for, consistancy is
the name of the game. It would be a shame to have a different look to
the actual OS.

Obviously all third party packages should be free to do as they please
with regards graphics and look, but the Official Debian packages, so to
speak, should have a look consistent through the distribution. This only
really applies to the default theme for KDM, GDM and the installer and
boot sequence, everything is up to the software they're using. If the CD
packaging has one logo, the installer a second, the bootloader a forth
and my display manager a sixth I may question how seriously these people
are taking this distro. People do think with their eyes, unfortunate as
that may be.

So I'd suggest the logo Mark Riedesel (Klowner) designed on the boot
installer gallery. Incidentally, what are the dimensions needed for the
installer boot logo and colour limitations?

yours,
Stephen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to