Jeff Bailey wrote: > In linux-kernel-di/modules/common, everything is done with the > assumption of a 2.4 kernel. > > I'd like to split this up into common-2.2, common-2.4, common-2.6 so > that various module renames can be handled sanely. > > This does mean that new module lists will need to be added in 3 places. > > Thoughts?
I have been trying to think of a way that wouldn't be specific to 2.4/2.6, since module renames happen in the 2.4.xx series too. One idea I had was to list the versions in the module list file: foo.o [2.4.24] foobar.o [2.4.25] But this could get complicated if more than one kernel version included a module. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
