Your message dated Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:22:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Feb 2004 18:40:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 20 10:40:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from n219076099001.netvigator.com (imsmq01.netvigator.com) [219.76.99.1] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AuFZd-0005lW-00; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:40:29 -0800
Received: (qmail 27903 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 18:40:22 -0000
Received: from n219078166028.netvigator.com (HELO gnupilgrims.org) (219.78.166.28)
  by imsmq01.netvigator.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 18:40:22 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:40:56 +0800
From: Hing-Wah Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation report for debian installer beta 2 on Samsung Q20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: Debian installer beta 2
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 unknown
Date: 2/21 2:29a,
Method: <How did you install?  What did you boot off?  If network
      install, from where?  Proxied?>
 Net install,since the installer doesn't support my IEEE1394 cd-rom , I would 
appreciate if ieee1394.o and sbp2.o can be included in cdrom modules dirver.
 Install from mirror http://ftp.hk.debian.org,no proxy.



Machine: Samsung Q20
Processor:1.1G
Memory: 512RAM
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 4 parition, 1 1-GB ntfs ,1  ext3 for / ,1 ext3 for /home, 1 
for swap <Feel free to paste the full partition
Output of lspci: not available since installation is not finished

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [E]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Reboot:                 [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

A first try of installing base system got the following in the end of deboostrap.log:

/* skip*/

dpkg: depency problems prevent configuration of lilo:
  lilo depends on libdevmapping1.00; however:
  Package libdevmapper1.00 is not installed

/* skip */
Errors were encounted while processing:
 lilo

/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep: not found


A second time retry install base system(without rebooting), got the following error:

ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: File exists
umount: /target/dev/pts: Invalid argument
umount: /target/dev/shm: Invalid argument
umount : /target/proc/bus/usb: Invalid argument.


Retries of installing base still got the umount error message and installation failed.


Thanks








<Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 233918-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2004 16:57:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 22 08:57:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mother.ludd.ltu.se [130.240.16.3] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Auwuu-0001N4-00; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:57:20 -0800
Received: from debian.org (oxtan.campus.luth.se [130.240.202.148])
        by mother.ludd.ltu.se (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1MGvDAr011946
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:57:18 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:22:21 +0100
From: Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Processed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level: 

Thank you for the information you have supplied regarding
this problems.

This reports have been categorised and reassigned to their respective 
package.


 >Net install,since the installer doesn't support my IEEE1394 cd-rom , I
 >would appreciate if ieee1394.o and sbp2.o can be included in cdrom
 >modules dirver. Install from mirror http://ftp.hk.debian.org,no proxy.

have been reassigned to the package cdrom-detect as bug 234208[0]

0. bugs.debian.org/234208


 >A first try of installing base system got the following in the end of 
 >deboostrap.log:
...

have been reassigned to the package base-installer as bug 234209[1]

1. bugs.debian.org/234209
-- 
Magnus Ekdahl 0739-287181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
public key available at http://oxtan.campus.luth.se/magnus.public
Key fingerprint = 18DE CB62 8A86 374E 824E  09ED 1987 4B18 1213 79F6


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to