Your message dated Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:24:48 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in beta 3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2004 16:31:58 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 03 08:31:58 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mta3.sucs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.128.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AyZHq-0007Vq-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 08:31:58 -0800 Received: from aa-13.aero.soton.ac.uk ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [152.78.240.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by mta3.sucs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i23GSnMY025705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:28:49 GMT From: Francis Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: University of Southampton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-report Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:27:57 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-ISS-MailScanner: Believed to be clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Beta2 3 Mar 2004 uname -a: Linux aa-13 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 3 Mar 2004 11:00 GMT Method: CD image (sarge-i386), followed by net install from www.mirror.ac.uk Machine: Generic Desktop Processor: Pentium 4 1.6 Ghz Memory: 256MB Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 1 4799 38547936 83 Linux /dev/hda2 4800 4866 538177+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 4800 4834 281106 82 Linux swap Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82850 850 (Tehama) Chipset Host Bridge (MCH) (rev 04) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82850 850 (Tehama) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev 04) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 04) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801BA IDE U100 (rev 04) 00:1f.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 04) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM SMBus (rev 04) 00:1f.4 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 04) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801BA/BAM AC'97 Audio (rev 04) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11DDR [GeForce2 MX 100 DDR/200 DDR] (rev b2) 02:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked: [O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems: [O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Everything went great, all hardware detected with no problems. Original install failed because I tried to install directly into a partition that had RH8 installed, some library conflicts ensued. On my second attempt, I wiped hda clean and created a new table, and the install went without a hitch: Excellent work! --------------------------------------- Received: (at 235982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 04:25:36 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 15 20:25:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B3691-0000kl-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:25:36 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dial174.pm3bloun1.bloun.naxs.com [216.98.69.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308D317DFC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 04:25:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D39406E118; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:24:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:24:48 -0500 From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed in beta 3 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, a while ago you reported a problem with the Debian Installer. I think that your problem is fixed in the just released beta 3 of the installer. If you're still able to install to the hardware you tried it on, please download it from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/, and try it again. Feel free to file another installation report. A few of the new features of beta 3 include: - new easy to use partitioner that supports automatic partitioning and LVM - grub as the default boot loader on i386 - wireless networking support - 2.4.25 kernel, with SATA support and security fixes - support for the XFS filesystem Note that your original installation report may have been split up into multiple individual bug reports. If so this message closes only one bug, and not other issues you reported. --=20 see shy jo --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAVoGQd8HHehbQuO8RAqF1AJ4zvTPHTsRl+8DOkmvaBYMiaAuojgCcDsTv ZDhI2P9sG2M8HbGk/OQXRyg= =Ov2T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]