On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 02:53:08AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > I really think that using the 'really' short names (that is just plain Taiwan > instead of Taiwan, P.. of C..) would not be a bad compromise despite what the > official so called short UN names say. > After all, isn't Linux for a large part about being "free" as in "able to > choose for yourselves" which is what Taiwan has been trying to to for the > past decades. > I think the really short names are often a lot more politically neutral than > the semi-official names in iso-3166. Especially as 3116 is incredibly > inconsistent. _Short_ names should be _short_. I also prefer the really _short_ name.
-- Best Regards, Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
