Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 15:50:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 09 08:50:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMqZk-0000Gc-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 08:50:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66829222F51
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 20761-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hellhound (orochi.topstudio.co.jp [202.224.239.193])
by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C106222F0E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: by hellhound (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A58392140A0; Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:46 +0900 (JST)
From: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer: netcfg/use_dhcp parameter can't be allowed on cdrom image
X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4
(patch 15) (Security Through Obscurity) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 00:50:46 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Version: 20040430
(Should be this bug to rootskel, cdebconf, or debian-installer-utils?)
debian-installer cdrom image help mentions 'netcfg/use_dhcp=false',
but this parameter is allowed ONLY for netboot image.
Scenario:
1. Add netcfg/use_dhcp=false for boot parameter
2. /lib/debian-installer.d/S25env2debconf is launched
3. S25env2debconf recognized boot parameter correctly, but...
4. templates for netcfg/use_dhcp isn't loaded yet. (netcfg package is
dynamic component loaded by anna on cdrom image.)
5. debconf-set simply goes fail and forget it.
6. When netcfg/use_dhcp is loaded by anna, default value is 'true'
from templates. Boot parameter is ignored.
Setting debconf answer at boot parameter is nice feature, but IMHO it needs
some tricks to resolve values of dynamic component templates.
Thanks,
- --
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkCeU1MACgkQQKW+7XLQPLETnwCgu3mYVOi2cHOXTZg6MQCWSURh
uDcAoLgDPd60UvcOfizJWoQw15Yf+LMB
=1rkM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 248147-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2004 22:08:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 15 15:08:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM6T-0003FB-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:08:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaM0L-00027J-00; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 0.69
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netcfg package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:34:25 -0700
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg-static netcfg-dhcp netcfg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.69
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
netcfg - Configure the network (udeb)
netcfg-dhcp - Configure the network via DHCP (udeb)
netcfg-static - Configure a static network (udeb)
Closes: 247734 248147 253086 253099 253361
Changes:
netcfg (0.69) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Sylvain Ferriol
- fix error message during plip config. (Closes: #253361)
* Christian Perrier
- Remove trailing exclamation mark from netcfg/dhcp_success_note
- Run debconf-updatepo and unfuzzy templates for removed exclamation mark
* Joshua Kwan
- Corrected reference to the pppconfig package. (Closes: #253086)
- killall.sh: add grep -v grep (Closes: #253099)
- Allow netcfg/disable_dhcp option that governs what use_dhcp is
set to every time we start, instead of hardcoding true. Defaults
to true, so default behavior has not changed. (Closes: #248147)
- Fix /etc/hosts writing after much deliberation. (Closes: #247734)
- Use a static buffer for mii-diag call.
- Sleep for 1.5 seconds before mii-diag, because slow network cards
just take that long to answer. And for those that take more that's
just too bad.
* Bastian Blank
- Readd postinst files for netcfg-dhcp and netcfg-static.
* Updated translations:
- Bosnian (bs.po) by Safir Šećerović
- German (de.po) by Alwin Meschede
- Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
- Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
Files:
1f4f445b201837e09519996e6f984d59 1526 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.69.dsc
0f6c26fd1e22e49cdfd8598c37807a4c 164920 debian-installer optional netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
00aba0fcc8c332b467e2d6dd9b93ea9a 133408 debian-installer optional
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
b45a912313f920d8883f11958178eea9 102358 debian-installer optional
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
6aa768786cb1473f0a7e9a97a71e41c5 109560 debian-installer optional
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=VUn/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
