Daily builds being back for i386 netinst, I restarted my systematic
tests
Tests in languages other than en or fr of course do not include
proofreading. These are "blind" tests focusing on bad display errors,
charset problems and final test of encoding things on the installed
systems.
Below, the pseudo locale indicates which language and country were
chosen in the first screens.
The expected locale for unprivileged user on the finally installed
system should use this language. Root should not have a localised
environment.
20040616
OK fr_FR 2.4
OK fr_FR 2.6
OK ja_JP 2.4 (no CJK display at console after final install)
OK ja_JP 2.6 (ditto)
OK en_US 2.4
OK en_US 2.6
OK fr_BR 2.4 (locale is fr_FR in 2nd stage which is expected. BR is
used for tz and mir defaults)
OK de_DE 2.6
*KO lowmem 2.4
*KO lowmem 2.6
20040620
OK lowmem 2.4
OK lowmem 2.6
OK fr_FR 2.4
OK ar_EG 2.4 (but no RTL in 2nd-stage...not d-i related)
20040621
OK fr_FR 2.4 at low priority (a few small glitches : too long screend
and one debconf display problem. None
d-i related)
OK hu_HU 2.4 (no shadow translation)
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
