Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ramdisk bug fixed already
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 14:47:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 02 07:47:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.180]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BKIFg-0008NU-00; Sun, 02 May 2004 07:47:32 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO gondor.middle-earth) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.251.58.101
with plain)
by smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2004 14:47:31 -0000
Received: from ardo by gondor.middle-earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BKIFY-0000dX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 02 May 2004 09:47:24 -0500
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 09:47:24 -0500
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: d-i beta4 boot problem with sun sparc60
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta4, official location
uname -a: (this is a clean machine)
Date: Sun May 2 09:42:10 CDT 2004
Method: netinst cdrom image, businesscard cdrom image
Machine: Sun Sparc60
Processor: 2 x 300MHz
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: (this is a clean machine)
Root Size/partition table: (this is a clean machine)
Output of lspci: (this is a clean machine)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [E]
Configure network HW: [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ ]
Mount partitions: [ ]
Install base system: [ ]
Install boot loader: [ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I get the following error message after the kernel successfully boots:
RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
Freeing initrd memory: 1766k freed
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
.....j½..Ñ...ɽ½Ñ.¡.áÑÉ..¥±..å.Ñ.µ¥.5)QÉå¥...ѽ.µ½...½±..ɽ½Ñ.ѽ.½¥.¥ÑÉ......½-.e
01:00: rw=0, want=4097, limit=4096
attempt to access beyond end of device
01:00: rw=0, want=4098, limit=4096
attempt to access beyond end of device
01:00: rw=0, want=4099, limit=4096
attempt to access beyond end of device
01:00: rw=0, want=4100, limit=4096
Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
Press L1-A to return to the boot prom
I'm getting this with both the netinst and the businesscard image. I've downloaded
them using wget and did the md5sum check with success.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 246959-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 22:14:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 17 15:14:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.188]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BlxRh-00071R-00; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:17 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.193.193 with
login)
by smtp809.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 22:14:16 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org
[192.168.0.7])
by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B94F2DDC1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BlxRf-00056K-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:14:15 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ramdisk bug fixed already
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Ardo,
We've definitively fixed the ramdisk_size problem on sparc. The only
remaining problem is your weird CD boot problems which may be due to
Solaris interference. Could you first try a new image and file a new bug
report? [1] I'm closing this bug as the primary issue has been fixed.
Thanks for reporting!
[1] http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/sparc/current/
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc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=yslj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
