**** THIS IS AN AUTOMATIC REPLY **** Your e-mail message to me (see below) was not delivered. I am no longer accepting mail from your address.
This extreme measure was most likely taken in response to unsolicited or unwanted e-mail from you. If you were attempting to market a commercial product or service to me, then please note that I am absolutely not interested in it. I take a dim view of any form of UCE, and on principle refuse to patronize any business that resorts to this tactic. **** ESTA MENSAGEM FOI GERADA AUTOMATICAMENTE *** A sua mensagem (abaixo) não foi entregue. Emails vindos do seu endereço não serão mais aceitos. Esta medida extrema foi provavelmente tomada em resposta à email não solicitado de sua parte. Se voce está tentando promover um produto ou serviço desta forma, saiba que não possuo qualquer interesse. É minha política pessoal não fazer negócios com qualquer empresa ou indivíduo que recorra a SPAM para promover o seu negócio. This email account is protected by: Active Spam Killer (ASK) V2.5.0 - (C) 2001-2002 by Marco Paganini For more information visit http://www.paganini.net/ask --- Original Message Follows --- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:30:55 +0200 To: peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.4.27 as default 2.4 kernel for sarge From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:30:27PM +0100, peter green wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 27 August 2004 22:59 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.4.27 as default 2.4 kernel for sarge > > > > > > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Quoting Joey Hess: > > > > 15. Get ftp-master to remove kernel udebs for the old kernel version > > > > from testing. This will *break* some old released install media > > > > (floppy, netboot, not cdrom), but it's necessary before release. > > > > > > Why is this necessary ? I'm a bit worried that rc1 netinst > > images do no more > > > work when sarge is released ... those images are widespread due to the > > > testing, and it's a pity to make them useless if we don't > > really need to. > > > > GPL compliance mostly. > > > > -- > > see shy jo > > > surely if you are not going to remove the udebs you would not remove the > debs or sources either so there would be no gpl compliance problem it is not easy, as the .udeb source package is not kernel-source versioned, so the same package produce both the older and and the newer set. When the newer ones reach the archive, the source packages is replaced, but not the older packages. Now, a solution would be to have version .udeb source packages as we do for .debs. We have to await NEW processing anyway, so nothing is lost. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
