Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272099: netboot: wrong cfg has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 12:55:30 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 05:55:30 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zeus07.fsv.cvut.cz [147.32.153.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C8IGw-0008My-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:55:30 -0700 Received: from xmedeko by zeus07.fsv.cvut.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C8IGS-0001mW-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:55:00 +0200 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:55:00 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: netboot: wrong cfg Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Ondrej Medek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Version: N/A; reported 2004-09-17 Severity: important Sorry, I've missed a link pxelinux.0 -> debian-installer/i386/pxelinux.0. When I use this file, everything works well. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 272099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 13:38:03 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 06:38:03 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C8Iw7-0003ZS-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:38:03 -0700 Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C8Ivc-0004bv-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:32 +0200 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#272099: netboot: wrong cfg Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: > I've just tried netboot to install sarge on a new box (DELL OptiPlex 280). > I've had to change pxelinux.cfg/default: I've removed prefix > "debian-installer/i386" from every path. So now it is: Problem solved by submitter; closing this report accordingly. FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]