Your message dated Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#272099: netboot: wrong cfg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 12:55:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 05:55:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus07.fsv.cvut.cz [147.32.153.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C8IGw-0008My-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 05:55:30 -0700
Received: from xmedeko by zeus07.fsv.cvut.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C8IGS-0001mW-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:55:00 +0200
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:55:00 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: netboot: wrong cfg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Ondrej Medek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-09-17
Severity: important
Sorry,
I've missed a link pxelinux.0 -> debian-installer/i386/pxelinux.0. When I
use this file, everything works well.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2004 13:38:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 17 06:38:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C8Iw7-0003ZS-00; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:38:03 -0700
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C8Ivc-0004bv-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:32 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#272099: netboot: wrong cfg
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 15:37:31 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
> I've just tried netboot to install sarge on a new box (DELL OptiPlex 280).
> I've had to change pxelinux.cfg/default: I've removed prefix
> "debian-installer/i386" from every path. So now it is:
Problem solved by submitter; closing this report accordingly.
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
