On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:42:20PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > BTW, we also should consider generating strict XHTML...... ;) > Hmm. I don't really know what that means and what the consequences and > (dis)advantages would be. Care to give some explanation and arguments?
Well, it's XHTML ;) But the advantages are actually: 1) XHTML is _the_ current HTML standard 2) XHTML is XML-based, might be easier to parse. 3) XHTML has the priority put onto the semantics and thus the design is CSS-based 4) It's easy to convert to it using XSL-stylesheet (I've actually seen an example somewhere, that's why I proposed that) But as it's marginally different from HTML4, the decision could be postponed to the time, when our XSL-Templates get mature and when we are able to generate PDFs for all languages ;) -- Nikolai Prokoschenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
