Robert Millan wrote: > > Which architectures include support for i2o_block? > > It's available on amd64, hppa, i386, ia64, powerpc. I tested it on amd64.
And dpt_i2o is not available on 64 bit, so if we're adding i2o_block to only arches that lack dpt_i20, then i2o_block should be added to ia64, hppa, powerpc(64?). > > And if dpt_i2o does > > the same thing for i386, whouldn't we include i2o_block only for those > > architectures that do not have dpt_i2o? > > Seems fine. Unless there are other advantages in using i2o_block that would > justify replacing dpt_i2o in 32bit arches; but I don't know about that. Right, of course the user would need to load it by hand in that case, since at least on i386 there's nothing to make udev load it. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
