Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 23 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote: >> All that's required for that, IMO, is for the new di-utils to propagate >> to testing before any dependent changes are made elsewhere. (Though >> versioned dependencies are a useful record, and don't have a huge cost; >> unlikely to consume more than a kilobyte uncompressed, I'd expect, which >> seems well worth it for their mnemonic value.) > > Sure. > > I see that di-utils is already included in pkg-lists/base, so deps are not > strictly necessary. How about dropping really ancient versioned deps (e.g. > older than the version in stable) at some point?
It looks right. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]