debian-bsd  

Messages by Thread

• Bug#1125101: RM: xpra [armhf i386] -- RoQA; not built since 2023, still depends on pre-t64 libraries Simon McVittie
• Bug#1123577: nmu: mesa_25.2.8-2: +b3 on !amd64 Simon McVittie
• OMP fixed in the llvm-21 packaging Matthias Klose
• gcc-16, first packaging bits Matthias Klose
• Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Simon Richter
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky kiruthikaanbusuresh
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marcin Juszkiewicz
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Kurt Roeckx
  • Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) jbranso
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) John David Anglin
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Philipp Kern
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Christopher Huhn
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) Falco Girgis
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • AW: Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Jan-Daniel Kaplanski
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Marc Haber
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Jaromír Cápík
  • Re: Planned obsolescence ? Riccardo Mottola
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Sicelo
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Hermann . Lauer
  • Re: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Klos
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Holger Levsen
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Lucas Nussbaum
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Gerardo Ballabio
  • Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Processed: tagging 1039160, found 1039160 in 0.10.2-3, tagging 1039382 ..., tagging 1039392 ..., tagging 1039334 ... Debian Bug Tracking System
• Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any? Guillem Jover
  • Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any? Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: Removing dpkg arch definitions for kfreebsd-any? Guillem Jover
• qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Bastian Blank
  • Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Rob Landley
  • Re: qemu-user viability (was Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 5983-1] qemu security update) Geert Uytterhoeven
  • Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  • Re: qemu-system-sh4eb build has something hinky in the ethernet Rob Landley
  • 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
  • Re: 64mb limitation of qemu-system-sh4 board John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Processed: tagging 1032917 Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian? Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)
• boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4. Matthias Klose
• Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures Matthias Klose
• Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
• Bug#1072228: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#1072228: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#750378: marked as done (freebsd-buildutils: Conflicting declarations of struct _node may result in invalid access) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1072230: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#1072230: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1072229: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#1072229: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#580949: marked as done (libnetgraph4: netgraph completely broken) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Processing of freebsd-manpages_12.2-2_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• freebsd-manpages_12.2-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1072392: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1072392: RM: ctfutils -- RoQA; RoQA; port abandoned Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1072230: RM: freebsd-glue -- RoQA; port abandoned Chris Hofstaedtler
• Bug#1072229: RM: freebsd-libs -- RoQA; port abandoned Chris Hofstaedtler
• Bug#1072228: RM: freebsd-buildutils -- RoQA; port abandoned Chris Hofstaedtler
• Processed: raise remaining usrmerge normal bugs to important Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Patrick Franz <[email protected]>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Bug#1067683: FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getmode’ Andrey Rakhmatullin
  • Bug#1067683: marked as done (FTBFS: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getmode’) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms Thorsten Glaser
• Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc Thorsten Glaser
• python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Helge Deller
• Bug#1063696: freebsd-libs: move libraries to /usr (DEP17) Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1063696: marked as done (freebsd-libs: move libraries to /usr (DEP17)) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1063552: libfreebsd-glue-0: move files to /usr (DEP17) Helmut Grohne
  • Bug#1063552: marked as done (libfreebsd-glue-0: move files to /usr (DEP17)) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1060900: freebsd-buildutils: add e_machine judgment for loongarch zhangdandan
  • Bug#1060900: marked as done (freebsd-buildutils: add e_machine judgment for loongarch) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1060120: freebsd-glue: modify gcc version for build Zhang Na
  • Bug#1060120: marked as done (freebsd-glue: modify gcc version for build) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1059608: freebsd-glue: Build dependency(gcc-9) is not satisfied in multiple architectures zhangdandan
  • Bug#1059608: marked as done (freebsd-glue: Build dependency(gcc-9) is not satisfied in multiple architectures) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed Simon McVittie
• Successfully built FreeBSD on Linux khush patil
  • Re: Successfully built FreeBSD on Linux Jessica Clarke
  • Re: Successfully built FreeBSD on Linux Carlos Saltos
• Bug#736716: marked as done (freebsd-manpages: Should be installed by default on kfreebsd-any) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Re: Bug#704802: [HACKERS] plperl segfault in plperl_trusted_init() on kfreebsd Christoph Berg
• freebsd-buildutils_10.3~svn296373-7.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of freebsd-buildutils_10.3~svn296373-7.1_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• freebsd-glue_0.2.22+nmu1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of freebsd-glue_0.2.22+nmu1_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#1041056: Removed package(s) from unstable Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#644798: marked as done (Interface naming in linprocfs) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#646997: marked as done (kfreebsd-10: lock order reversal (bufwait vs dirhash) in ufs_direnter) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#684072: marked as done (CVE-2011-2393) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#705126: marked as done (kfreebsd-9: maxproc limit exceeded, caused by sshd) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#729746: marked as done (MAXLOGNAME increased (17 -> 32)) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#758084: marked as done (kfreebsd-image-amd64 lacks support for i210 ethernet) Debian Bug Tracking System
  • Bug#842272: marked as done (should flush timestamps early enough) Debian Bug Tracking System
• Bug#1041057: Removed package(s) from experimental Debian FTP Masters
  • Bug#1041057: Removed package(s) from experimental Debian FTP Masters
• Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeff Layton
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Dave Chinner
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Theodore Ts'o
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Linus Torvalds
• ctfutils_10.3~svn297264-2.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Debian FTP Masters
• Processing of ctfutils_10.3~svn297264-2.1_source.changes Debian FTP Masters
• Bug#1041057: RM: kfreebsd-11 -- RoQA; useless, unmaintained Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1041056: RM: kfreebsd-10 -- RoQA; useless, unmaintained, has RC bug Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1039246: istgt: ships sysv-init script without systemd unit bluca
  • Processed: ships sysv-init script without systemd unit Debian Bug Tracking System
• unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Steve McIntyre
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Omer Turpault
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kirsten Bromilow
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Rene Engelhard
  • Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Rene Engelhard
  • Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Adrian Bunk
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Paul Wise
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
  • Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
• Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Future of GNU/kFreeBSD in the debian-ports archive Matt Arnold

• Earlier messages