Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Tuco <tuco....@gmail.com> (05/08/2010): > > I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, > > 'uname -m' prints amd64!
That's correct IMHO: -m, --machine print the machine hardware name > > This often breaks configure scripts and build systems. > Relying on uname's output is buggy. People shouldn't do that. In this case, yes, especially not on "uname -m". But this is no generally valid statement. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100805191157.gz11...@sym.noone.org