torsdag den 20 januari 2011 klockan 13:29 skrev Petr Salinger detta: >> This was very helpful, so now is the time for two strategic questions. >> >> 1. I suggest to let "src:freebsd-utils" build a new binary >> package "freebsd-quota". Would this naming be acceptable? > > In fact, we already have also source package zfsutils (and ufsutils) [1]. > The whole new source package might be reasonable for freebsd-quota.
Well, then I will prepare (have in fact done so, except init script, and format "3.0 (quilt)") a separate package named `freebsd-quota' built from manually extracted source out of freebsd-8.1-release. I will file an ITP by the end of this European day, beginning night, so issue a protest timely enough if you have a better alternative. > >> 2. Since I need to mend seven of these (only `quotaon' is flawless), >> is there some subdivision of patches according to directories that >> best fits the customs of this group of developers? I prefer to get >> to know such practice already now in order to lessen your later >> peer review labour. > > See debian/patches in freebsd-utils. I was more intending at any preferred grouping of smaller patches across the directory boundaries that were originally mentioned. Now that I go for a separate package, I will follow my own head in patch production. Best regards Mats E A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110121115711.ga2...@mea.homelinux.org