IMO, my suggested change (Perl_atfork_reinit) in "Message #54" [1]
still should be aplied by perl upstream. While it might not be
problem for this testcase, the unlocking in forked child is fragile.
Hi,
I finally (!) got round to submitting this upstream, at [1], and the
comment so far is that the patch isn't appropriate. If you have any
further thoughts, could you comment on the upstream RT ticket?
If I remember correctly, the perl code expects something which is not
guaranteed by POSIX. But our new implementation provides this, therefore
we (kfreebsd) are not affected by this any longer.
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1309091011520.13...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
