On 12/03/2014 19:04, Niels Thykier wrote: > As I read/understand the above, you basically say (something along the > lines of): > > """ > The Debian kFreeBSD porters will not support packages, where upstream > have no (visible) interest/intention of being portable (beyond > ${OS}-any) nor their reverse dependencies. Examples of these include > (but are not limited to) systemd and GNOME (via GDM). > """ > > It is not that I want to change your wording or anything. I just wanted > to make sure I had captured the important parts of it.
I don't think it's possible to put this in generic wording. There are specific reasons why GNOME can't be considered a portable program. I think they're enough well-known so that I shouldn't need to publicize them. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5320d8d4.2080...@debian.org