On 12/03/2014 19:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As I read/understand the above, you basically say (something along the
> lines of):
>
> """
> The Debian kFreeBSD porters will not support packages, where upstream
> have no (visible) interest/intention of being portable (beyond
> ${OS}-any) nor their reverse dependencies. Examples of these include
> (but are not limited to) systemd and GNOME (via GDM).
> """
>
> It is not that I want to change your wording or anything. I just wanted
> to make sure I had captured the important parts of it.
I don't think it's possible to put this in generic wording. There are specific
reasons why GNOME can't be considered a portable program. I think they're enough
well-known so that I shouldn't need to publicize them.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5320d8d4.2080...@debian.org
