Hi,
Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> writes:
> I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie
> release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I
> think would be best from our point of view and you tell me if I'm crazy
> or not:
>
> + There would be a jessie-kfreebsd thing next to the "normal" jessie
> with kfreebsd folks responsible for
> + Ideally that jessie-kfreebsd thing would exist as soon as possible so
> we can do our release preparations there
I think we can setup a jessie-kfreebsd suite. I guess it should
- just accept uploads (provided versions are greater-equal testing)
- contain just 3 archs: all, kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}
- have no extra policy queues, and
- share overrides with jessie.
Uploads should probably include a specific suffix to avoid version
clashes with the offical release (for source and arch:all packages).
> + Ideally -release@ would accept us in testing as long as possible
> (without any blocking characteristics there) and we copy everything
> that is not superseeded in jessie-kfreebsd there rather late
Well, kfreebsd is still in testing for now ;)
> The last point of course depends on what release thinks of it and the
> implications for them. And I have no idea if it's reasonably easy for
> you to do a copy everything apart from the things we already uploaded
> separately.
Copying everything from testing should not be too complicated if we only
need to do so once.
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fvc1gi1c....@deep-thought.43-1.org
