Your message dated Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:39:46 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed, sponsoring misregarded as NMU, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2004 14:23:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 14 06:23:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2000-2.so-net.net.tw [61.64.127.18] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CeDaS-0000tD-00; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 06:23:36 -0800
Received: from 219.84.6.217
        by mail2000-2.so-net.net.tw with Mail2000 ESMTP Server 
V3.20S(51185:3:AUTH_RELAY)
        (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:23:03 +0800 
(CST)
Received: by zephyr (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A1B3D333B0; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:22:54 +0800 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Should depend or suggest with scim-*-scoket packages for enabling full
 functions
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 22:22:54 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: scim
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: important


The author of SCIM told me the scim should depend on scim-*-socket
packages for enabling full functions and reduce memery usage of scim.

Using scim without scim-*-socket packages installed will makes system
unstable and takes more longer time for loading each the IMEngines.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-cko3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages scim depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0               1.8.0-3        The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-19   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                   1:3.4.3-4      GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.4.8-1        The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0               2.4.13-1       The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0             1.6.0-3        Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libstdc++5                1:3.3.5-3      The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285623-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 02:42:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 18:42:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from handler4.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CoYT7-0007uu-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:42:45 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by handler4.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 798731DB06;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:42:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by handler4.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB611DB04;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:42:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from handler4.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (handler4.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 22955-07; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:42:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from danube.mems.rice.edu (danube.mems.rice.edu [128.42.57.44])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by handler4.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9143C1DB01;
        Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:42:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from minghua by danube.mems.rice.edu with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CoYQE-0002DF-Kh; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:39:46 -0600
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:39:46 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug fixed, sponsoring misregarded as NMU, closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030616-p6 at mail.rice.edu
X-DCC--Metrics: handler4.mail.rice.edu 1066; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This bug was fixed in 1.0.1-4, but the sponsored package was taken as an
NMU.  So closing it by hand.

Osamu, I don't know why it's taken as an NMU, but I think it's because
the Maintainer: is you but Changed-By is me.  I think there are some
dpkg-buildpackage option to fix this.  I remember reading some
discussion on debian-mentor.  If you don't have time, I can try to
figure it out.

Ming
2005.01.11


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to