Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:26:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2004 14:17:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 14 06:17:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sun1.ba-loerrach.de [193.196.4.179] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1B2WQd-00068Q-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:17:23 -0800
Received: from marwin.ba-loerrach.de ([193.196.4.242] ident=postfix)
        by sun1.ba-loerrach.de with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
        id 1B2WQ7-0007Nh-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:51 +0100
Received: by marwin.ba-loerrach.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 7FA1257D43; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:51 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Schwindt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gwhois: Enhancement (?) - Add ham call resolving funktionality?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.50
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:51 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gwhois
Version: 20040307-2
Severity: wishlist

Don't know if this is discussable - or should one maybe build an extra
package for that?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-pre4
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages gwhois depends on:
ii  debconf                   1.4.13         Debian configuration management sy
ii  libwww-perl               5.76-2         WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  lynx-ssl [lynx]           1:2.8.4.1b-3.1 Text-mode WWW Browser supporting S
ii  netbase                   4.16           Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  perl                      5.8.3-2        Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237940-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 22:33:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 14:33:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zeus.keleos.net (mail.keleos.net) [217.160.107.39] (qmailr)
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cpa0B-0008A3-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:33:08 -0800
Received: (qmail 31934 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jan 2005 22:26:24 -0000
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:26:24 +0100
From: Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Won't fix. Closing for now.

Regards
Michael

-- 
      It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to