Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:55:08 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290497: Wake-on-LAN not working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 12:56:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 04:56:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from i139.graeff.com (tuallix.graeff.com) [193.5.61.139]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CpQzo-0000k4-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 04:56:08 -0800
Received: from susix.graeff.com (susix [192.168.73.1])
by tuallix.graeff.com (8.12.11.Beta0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id
j0ECtXbf001530
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:55:34 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by susix.graeff.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id
j0ECtX8X021492
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:55:33 +0100
Subject: Wake-on-LAN not working
From: Thomas Aeby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:55:33 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Filter-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Filter-Recipients: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Filter-Details:
X-Filter: 0 nospam
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.85-22
Severity: wishlist
When shutting down the system /etc/init.d/halt will /sbin/halt the
system and request all the network interfaces to be shut down via
the "-i" option. It seems that some (some/all/few? I do not know,
I've run into this on my systems armed with e100 driven network
cards, but have not been able to track this down to the e100 driver)
network drivers do disable wake on LAN when shutting down
without paying attention to the fact that WOL has explicitly being
enabled.
When halt-ing withouth -i the network cards keep their WOL status.
I therefore suggest making -i optional similiar to the HALT setting
in /etc/default/halt, probably defaulting to -i enabled.
Best regards,
Tom
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290497-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2005 01:55:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 17:55:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 10fwd.cistron-office.nl (smtp.cistron-office.nl) [62.216.29.197]
(mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cpd9q-0006uV-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:55:19 -0800
Received: from a80-126-193-215.adsl.xs4all.nl ([80.126.193.215]
helo=stargazer.cistron.net)
by smtp.cistron-office.nl with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Cpd9j-0005tl-00; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:55:11 +0100
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:55:08 +0000
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#290497: Wake-on-LAN not working
To: Thomas Aeby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri
Jan 14 13:55:33 2005)
X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; Format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:55:33, Thomas Aeby wrote:
> Package: initscripts
> Version: 2.85-22
> Severity: wishlist
>=20
> When shutting down the system /etc/init.d/halt will /sbin/halt the
> system and request all the network interfaces to be shut down via
> the "-i" option. It seems that some (some/all/few? I do not know,
> I've run into this on my systems armed with e100 driven network
> cards, but have not been able to track this down to the e100 driver)
> network drivers do disable wake on LAN when shutting down
> without paying attention to the fact that WOL has explicitly being
> enabled.
>=20
> When halt-ing withouth -i the network cards keep their WOL status.
>=20
> I therefore suggest making -i optional similiar to the HALT setting
> in /etc/default/halt, probably defaulting to -i enabled.
WOL is card-specific functionality, so if it doesn't work as you'd
like it to, talk to the kernel network maintainers or the
network driver developers. It's not something this sysvinit
maintainer can fix for you.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
