Your message dated Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:34:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Re: snd-intel8x0 doesn't work on IBM T41 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 16:45:26 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 08:45:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqDWo-0001jW-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 08:45:26 -0800 Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([83.160.174.170]:42064 helo=localhost) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CqDWm-000LH4-7W; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:45:24 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCEE10D781; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:43:06 +0100 (CET) Subject: snd-intel8x0 doesn't work on IBM T41 From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Juraj Holtak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:43:05 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: alsa-source Version: 1.0.7-2 I am submitting your comment as a new bug report to the Debian BTS. On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 15:55 +0100, Juraj Holtak wrote in part: > after last alsa upgrade of testing I don`t get any sound out of my IBM > T41. A colleague of mine has the same problem with IBM T40. Before that > upgrade, sound worked properly. [...] > 0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM > (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01) > 0000:00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) > AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 01) [...] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod > Module Size Used by > snd_intel8x0 34856 0 > snd_ac97_codec 73936 1 snd_intel8x0 > snd_pcm_oss 54568 0 > snd_mixer_oss 20736 1 snd_pcm_oss > snd_pcm 99208 2 snd_intel8x0,snd_pcm_oss > snd_timer 26116 1 snd_pcm > snd_page_alloc 10248 2 snd_intel8x0,snd_pcm > snd_mpu401_uart 8320 1 snd_intel8x0 > snd_rawmidi 25252 1 snd_mpu401_uart > snd_seq_device 8456 1 snd_rawmidi > snd 58212 9 > snd_intel8x0,snd_ac97_codec,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_timer,snd_mpu401_uart,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device > soundcore 10080 1 snd > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ alsamixer > > alsamixer: function snd_ctl_open failed for default: No such file or > directory > > if I start alsaconf it finds my card configures it and does as > everything was OK, but it isn`t because -> no sound Is this a bug in the driver or in the Debian packaging? -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------- Received: (at 290776-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2005 17:35:06 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 09:35:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CqxFy-0003i3-00; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:06 -0800 Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10) id 575395F710; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:35:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4E0841C8E8; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:34:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:34:52 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Processed: Re: snd-intel8x0 doesn't work on IBM T41 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, this is obviously a duplicate of #283758, so I'm closing it. It's either already fixed or a corner case too much obscure to waste more time on, as it may only be triggered when upgrading from some specific old release. Thomas: please *ALWAYS* Cc bugs to the bug address when reassigning them. --=20 ciao, Marco --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB7Ui8FGfw2OHuP7ERAjXMAJ9NllFdbxI79wEk751LyuoOunz+/QCfRHMk zlO79l1rNGMHy6oA67FCzio= =4CTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
