Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:53 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line docsfix
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2005 21:00:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 10 13:00:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bonn.shuttle.de [194.95.249.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Co6e0-0004pl-00; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:00:08 -0800
Received: by bonn.shuttle.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 5C6DD6C1FB; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:00:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=amavis)
by yggdrasil.mitch.h.shuttle.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Co6a6-0004j8-KJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:56:06 +0100
Received: from yggdrasil.mitch.h.shuttle.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (yggdrasil [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16912-07; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:56:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mitch by yggdrasil.mitch.h.shuttle.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Co6a5-0004j2-3y; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:56:05 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:56:05 +0100
From: Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bogofilter always reports spamicity=0.520000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
X-Accept-Language: de, en
X-LinuxCounter: Registered Linux User 158702 at http://counter.li.org
X-Virus: Hi! I'm a header virus! Copy me into yours and join the fun!
X-GPG-Key: http://www.h.shuttle.de/mitch/gpg-key
X-GPG-KeyID: E77F37EE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mitch.h.shuttle.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: bogofilter
Version: 0.93.3.1-1
Severity: important
I had some problems with the upgrade from 0.93.1 bogofilter version,
so I just removed my old wordlist and started new with a clean and
empty ~/.bogofilter directory.
I'm using procmail to classify my mail, the receipt looks like the one
in the bogofilter manpage (except for an extra "-l" for syslog output
and an explicit "-d ~/.bogofilter" to point to my directory).
The mails actually get filtered by bogofilter, but every single mail
gets this classification:
X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=3Dbogofilter, spamicity=3D0.520000, version=3D0.9=
3.3.1
I can mark a mail as spam and then bounce it back to myself, it will
be scanned properly and get spamicity=3D0.52 again.
My syslog looks like this:
Jan 10 08:23:29 yggdrasil bogofilter[8910]: register-Ns, 250 words, 1 messa=
ges
Jan 10 08:23:37 yggdrasil bogofilter[8932]: register-Ns, 282 words, 1 messa=
ges
Jan 10 08:24:07 yggdrasil bogofilter[8966]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 08:24:14 yggdrasil bogofilter[8972]: register-Ns, 175 words, 1 messa=
ges
Jan 10 09:12:15 yggdrasil bogofilter[11668]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 09:24:08 yggdrasil bogofilter[12207]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
[...]
Jan 10 16:24:06 yggdrasil bogofilter[2119]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 16:36:10 yggdrasil bogofilter[2965]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 17:24:09 yggdrasil bogofilter[5313]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 17:56:28 yggdrasil bogofilter[6937]: register-Ns, 207 words, 1 messa=
ges
Jan 10 17:56:39 yggdrasil bogofilter[6955]: register-Ns, 1069 words, 1 mess=
ages
Jan 10 17:56:56 yggdrasil bogofilter[6963]: register-Ns, 195 words, 1 messa=
ges
Jan 10 18:00:14 yggdrasil bogofilter[17895]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 18:12:06 yggdrasil bogofilter[24940]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
[...]
Jan 10 21:36:14 yggdrasil bogofilter[16926]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:37:36 yggdrasil bogofilter[17010]: register-Ns, 159 words, 1 mess=
ages
Jan 10 21:38:19 yggdrasil bogofilter[17060]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:38:34 yggdrasil bogofilter[17083]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:38:37 yggdrasil bogofilter[17086]: register-Sn, 144 words, 1 mess=
ages
Jan 10 21:38:58 yggdrasil bogofilter[17102]: register-Sn, 201 words, 1 mess=
ages
Jan 10 21:39:00 yggdrasil bogofilter[17114]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:39:04 yggdrasil bogofilter[17148]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:39:05 yggdrasil bogofilter[17151]: register-Sn, 255 words, 1 mess=
ages
Jan 10 21:48:08 yggdrasil bogofilter[17748]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
Jan 10 21:48:09 yggdrasil bogofilter[17764]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.520000, version=3D0.93.3.1=20
With the old version 0.93.1 everything was fine for me:
Jan 6 11:48:09 yggdrasil bogofilter[15096]: X-Bogosity: Spam, spamicity=3D=
1.000000, version=3D0.93.1, register-s, 220 words, 1 messages=20
Jan 6 11:48:09 yggdrasil bogofilter[15101]: X-Bogosity: Spam, spamicity=3D=
1.000000, version=3D0.93.1, register-s, 179 words, 1 messages=20
Jan 6 11:52:57 yggdrasil bogofilter[15413]: X-Bogosity: Unsure, spamicity=
=3D0.499758, version=3D0.93.1=20
Jan 6 12:24:07 yggdrasil bogofilter[16686]: X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=3D0=
=2E000000, version=3D0.93.1, register-n, 320 words, 1 messages=20
Jan 6 12:36:06 yggdrasil bogofilter[17203]: X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=3D0=
=2E000000, version=3D0.93.1, register-n, 359 words, 1 messages
My freshly created directory looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l .bogofilter/
insgesamt 2772
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 16384 2005-01-10 21:38 __db.001
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 5251072 2005-01-10 21:38 __db.002
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 98304 2005-01-10 21:38 __db.003
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 4063232 2005-01-10 21:38 __db.004
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 16384 2005-01-10 21:38 __db.005
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 0 2005-01-10 21:38 lockfile-d
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 1024 2005-01-10 21:48 lockfile-p
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 1048576 2005-01-10 21:48 log.0000000001
-rw------- 1 mitch mitch 20480 2005-01-10 21:39 wordlist.db
My crontab contains this entry to remove the huge logs that can
accumulate:
#
# remove bogofilter database transaction logs
#
44 4 * * * db4.3_archive -h ~/.bogofilter -d
What is wrong here?
Why do all my mails get classified as spamicity=3D0.52?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages bogofilter depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libdb4.3 4.3.21-11 Berkeley v4.3 Database Librari=
es [
ii libgsl0 1.5-2 The GNU Scientific Library (GS=
L) -
-- no debconf information
--=20
=2E...Christian.Garbs.....................................http://www.cgarbs=
=2Ede
The sum of the Universe is zero.
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB4uvk50xh8Od/N+4RAvVTAKCqO+FkipyVBJhZGNKSWXjVm4+XgQCfWPPv
DnF/03/I/84786pDvLxDRsM=
=y/SL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 15:30:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 07:30:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from acolyte.scowler.net [216.254.112.45]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CsjhW-0008RP-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:30:54 -0800
Received: by acolyte.scowler.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 074AF7004A; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:30:53 -0500
From: Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: docsfix
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
I believe the documentation was fixed in a previous version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
