Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:47:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283541: fixed in procps 1:3.2.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2004 19:14:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 29 11:14:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rt-soft-2.moscow.itn.ru (mail.dev.rtsoft.ru) [80.240.96.70]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CYqyz-00028Y-00; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:14:46 -0800
Received: (qmail 6686 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 18:49:21 -0000
Received: from build-gw.dev.rtsoft.ru (HELO ?192.168.12.11?) (192.168.1.3)
by mail.dev.rtsoft.ru with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 18:49:21 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:14:43 +0300
From: Alex Batyrshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: return code for top (procps-3.2.4)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: procps
Version: all (include 3.2.4)
When I invoke `top -v' from an ordinary shell promt it prints
version and usage information, and exit with *not zero* return value.
Here is a transcript:
[procps-3.2.4]$ ./top -v
top: procps version 3.2.4
usage: top -hv | -bcisS -d delay -n iterations [-u user | -U user] -p pid
[,pid ...]
[procps-3.2.4]$ echo $?
1
I suggest that the return value be corrected.
It is common issue and related to source code only.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283541-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2005 00:53:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 16:53:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtxuE-0004Xi-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:53:06 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtxoN-0000Xt-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:47:03 -0500
From: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#283541: fixed in procps 1:3.2.5-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:47:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: procps
Source-Version: 1:3.2.5-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
procps, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libproc-dev_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/procps/libproc-dev_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
procps_3.2.5-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.2.5-1.diff.gz
procps_3.2.5-1.dsc
to pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.2.5-1.dsc
procps_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
procps_3.2.5.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.2.5.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated procps package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:07:46 +1100
Source: procps
Binary: procps libproc-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:3.2.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libproc-dev - library for accessing process information from /proc
procps - /proc file system utilities
Closes: 246123 264640 283541 287691 287947
Changes:
procps (1:3.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
display problem on 64-bit systems fixed Closes: #287947
top: help and version message on stdout, with exit(0) Closes: #283541
ps: SIGTSTP and SIGTTOU shouldn't print bug email address Closes: #246123
slabtop: fix overflow on huge NUMA boxes Closes: #264640
slabtop: accept any slabinfo 2.x format Closes: #287691
Files:
7d86f621cafc06ba2252224da1f3b153 616 base required procps_3.2.5-1.dsc
cde0e3612d1d7c68f404d46f01c44fb4 277365 base required procps_3.2.5.orig.tar.gz
461638a591ddf085b45ae019e1e07650 24971 base required procps_3.2.5-1.diff.gz
02b0c55dbecc044b5652644205139404 214674 base required procps_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
f0b8eb7fd44d873c8a5c155d9ea5dbce 54268 libdevel optional
libproc-dev_3.2.5-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB+DYPx2zlrBLK36URAkRkAJ9r2KbB8kJbIaTG912OyRTKUhI2BwCfdZkE
fhyvKrTc8XXDjHbhwJmxzws=
=9RVk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
