Your message dated Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:51:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294090: udev: upgrading error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 20:07:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 12:07:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mtaout4.barak.net.il [212.150.49.174]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyFAN-0005ZF-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:07:27 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([212.150.100.132])
by mtaout4.barak.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02
(built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:15:29 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:06:48 +0200
From: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev: upgrading error
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bcc: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: udev
Version: 0.051-1
Severity: minor
While upgrading I got these warnings:
Preparing to replace udev 0.050-6 (using .../archives/udev_0.051-1_i386.deb)
...Unpacking replacement udev ...
dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/etc/udev/permissions.d': Directory
not empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/udev$ ls -l permissions.d/
total 4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 324 2004-11-01 13:39 alsa-base.permissions.dpkg-old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2669 2004-12-15 22:35 udev.permissions
Could you add a check in the upgrading scripts to check these files
(*.dpkg-old) and files which their contents get into the new config.
Thanks,
lior Kaplan
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2004-12-05 22:54 cd-aliases.rules ->
../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2004-07-09 19:38 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
-- /sys/:
/sys/block/fd0/dev
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda3/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda5/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda6/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda7/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda8/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda9/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/block/sr0/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/ts0/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/printer/lp0/dev
/sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/dspW/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midi/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer2/dev
/sys/class/sound/sequencer/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
-- Kernel configuration:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-16 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
ii sed 4.1.4-1 The GNU sed stream editor
-- debconf information:
udev/devfs-warning:
* udev/reboot-warning:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294090-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 20:52:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 12:52:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyFrV-0006sK-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:52:01 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 1EA215F806; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:51:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id B00251C19F; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:51:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:51:53 +0100
To: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#294090: udev: upgrading error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 07, Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you add a check in the upgrading scripts to check these files (*.dp=
kg-old) and files which their contents get into the new config.
No. This is standard dpkg behaviour, and there is no way to
automatically convert permissions files to rules files.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCB9TpFGfw2OHuP7ERAvsOAJ0Rzs4P05Rzig//LcQC/36R90TEnwCeLMDk
mOzyGiChiR1N1R3JO47A/d8=
=EkGm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
