Your message dated Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:43:04 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line popfile: mail history problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2004 11:57:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 03:57:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COaoS-0005mK-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:57:28 -0800
Received: from roulaize.skamp-zo.org ([127.0.0.1]) [82.67.109.46]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COaoQ-0005MQ-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:57:26 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Arno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: popfile: mail history problem
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:57:24 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: popfile
Version: 0.22.1-1
Severity: important
Hello,
I've received today (dated as tomorow) a spam, classified as a mail. I would lik
e to reclassified it but ... it wasn't in the history! (there is an other mail a
t the url provided in the headers!)
It seems to be the only mail who isn't present in the history. It's the first ti
me i've got this kind of problem (since about six month i'm using popfile)
As i don't want to be spamed more and more at the email adresse who was spamed (
and the mail has be send on a mailling-list public adress of a newspaper who rec
eived already enough spam ;) ), i don't attached the mail at this mail (i don't
want that's the received spam be archived on the debian mailling list) and i'll
put the log of popfile and the received mail here :
<http://skamp.domainepublic.net/spam/>
bye,
Arno
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages popfile depends on:
ii adduser 3.59 Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy
ii libdbd-sqlite-perl 0.29-1 Perl DBI driver with a self-contai
ii libhtml-tagset-perl 3.03-2 Data tables pertaining to HTML
ii libhtml-template-perl 2.6-2 HTML::Template : A module for usin
ii libsoap-lite-perl 0.55-4 Perl5 modules for client and serve
ii libtimedate-perl 1.1600-4 Time and date functions for Perl
ii perl 5.8.4-2.3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 279191-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 21:43:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 13:43:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ol8-163.fibertel.com.ar (linux.kadath.com.ar) [24.232.163.8]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CyGex-0006i6-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:43:07 -0800
Received: from rlyeh.kadath.kk ([192.168.25.3] ident=kthulhu)
by linux.kadath.com.ar with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1CyGev-0007Q8-Cv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:43:05 -0300
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:43:04 -0300
From: Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: popfile: mail history problem
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigD2D3DFDA402DEDD060ADD132"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigD2D3DFDA402DEDD060ADD132
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I got no futher information of this bug. A long time has passed and I
have not seen this issue reported to upstream. Nor have I been able to
reproduce this bug with the current, and last, version of popfile.
If this issue reapears then this, or a new, bug should be reported,
including more info in the report.
K.
--
.''`. | Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux | Buenos Aires, Argentina
`. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.kadath.com.ar
`- | PGP: 1024D/84FB46D6
http://people.debian.org/~lwall | 5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356A
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6
--------------enigD2D3DFDA402DEDD060ADD132
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCB+DovJtHM4T7RtYRAiycAJ48oi6lG55bodfRgdo3ib5IroNb9QCg29jP
eky/NkCCF2BoNnyr+4uVPdk=
=gVkH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigD2D3DFDA402DEDD060ADD132--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
