Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:53:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Btmp does exist in Debian (closing this bug)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 21:05:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 16 13:05:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CqHax-0005bg-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:05:59 -0800
Received: from andromeda (syr-24-59-54-124.twcny.rr.com [24.59.54.124])
        by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j0GL5sK3017299;
        Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:05:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pryzbyj by andromeda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CqHaq-0000o4-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:05:52 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tiger: Don't report problems that aren't problems for Debian
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:05:51 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tiger
Severity: wishlist


WRT bug #290803, it would be nice if tiger would not report "root
security hole" when that does not apply to Debian systems, or if it
would give a warning, or include "on Debian, this is intentional".
Modifying that string should be moderately easy.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290808-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 07:54:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 23:54:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (silicio) [213.96.98.148] 
(Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D0xXm-0007NH-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:54:50 -0800
Received: from jfs by silicio with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1D0xWx-0006gf-6s; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:53:59 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:53:58 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Btmp does exist in Debian (closing this bug)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Actually, reviewing this bug, it looks like the error is correct
for Debian. Btmp does exist (or at least, you can create it)
as mentioned in lastb (1), it is even rotated by the default
logrotate configuration if it exists.=20

Btmp should log bad login attempts, but it only does it
if you chmod it o-r (the manpage does not say this).

We actually changed the check for Tiger (scripts/check_logfiles)
a while back to have it warn in Linux (it previously didn't)

Regards

Javier


--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCEaqWsandgtyBSwkRAqr4AJwKVODyRDsjpSgbvnHUD/n3f847dwCfY8WS
pcF3pkZ/gnNT4tHsJ/4kLbI=
=Xj+o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to