Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:22:04 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282208: check with the 1.0.0.1-1 version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2004 13:15:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 20 05:15:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CVV53-00077Y-00; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:15:09 -0800
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q1so105663rnf
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:15:08 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=FZ62wP0oe7e+wZJ6549C9x+UKKBpe4HnJ0wqhB5VXjQeHiayBlmw41QXznyRdirIIDNbSXbcxr2O1FeYomuqNU4gCY/je7raxSjnpfTMo0xjYDMJ63YmH9vpS8XjEnww/CCcWfL2plJol4M3UxZI20asIX7T58Cia0pPdU6dWDQ=
Received: by 10.38.104.41 with SMTP id b41mr124941rnc;
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.171.69 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 05:15:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:15:08 +0100
From: Adrien Di Mascio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Adrien Di Mascio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: freeing rdf_model yields a segfault
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: python2.3-librdf
Version: 0.9.18.1-1
Section: python
Architecture: i386
Source: redland-bindings
Linux - 2.4.19 #19 lun oct 21 15:30:39 CEST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux
code yielding a segfault :
====================
import RDF
def run():
fs =3D RDF.FileStorage("/tmp/tmpstore.rdf") # Emtpy file
model =3D RDF.Model(fs)
stmt =3D RDF.Statement(RDF.Node("subj"),
RDF.Uri("http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/creator";),
RDF.Node("obj"))
model.add_statement(stmt)
if __name__ =3D=3D '__main__':
run()
Additional Informations
==================
This example code is quite similar to the package's example, and
should not produce a segfault
The same code, tested on python2.3 and (locally compiled) python2.4 +
compiled redland-0.9.19 / redland-bindings-0.9.19.1 does not end up in
a segfault.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282208-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 21:22:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 13:22:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 82-32-5-28.cable.ubr01.azte.blueyonder.co.uk (hedwig.dajobe.org)
[82.32.5.28]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1WcY-00008K-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:22:07 -0800
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by hedwig.dajobe.org with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D1WcX-0003OU-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:22:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Bug#282208: check with the 1.0.0.1-1 version
From: Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:22:04 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 21:46 +0100, Adrien Di Mascio wrote:
> I checked this bug with the new version of python2.3-librdf. It works
> fine, I can't reproduce it.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrien.
Closing this bug consequently.
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
