Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:02:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#236685: fixed in procmail 3.22-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 20:41:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 12:41:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from livetv.airwire.net (bell.livetv-ifs.com) [209.114.201.30] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D4mGu-00059v-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:41:12 -0800
Received: from ccurtis by bell.livetv-ifs.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1D4mGr-00035A-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:41:09 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christopher W. Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: procmail: mail is lost if mailspool file > 2GB
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:41:09 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Christopher W. Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: procmail
Version: 3.22-10
Severity: important


Hi - I've been losing mail for about a week now because my mail file has
grown larger than 2GB.  My system is capable of generating larger files
as I'm able to append to the file using 'cat', but procmail refuses to
add to the file using a standard

:0
/path/to/file

type recipe.  I modified the debian/rules file and rebuilt the package
using the directions I found here:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00096.html

and it seems to be working again.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages procmail depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 236685-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 16:08:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 08:08:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D69uv-0007lh-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 08:08:14 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D69p0-0007Yh-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:02:06 -0500
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#236685: fixed in procmail 3.22-11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:02:06 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: procmail
Source-Version: 3.22-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
procmail, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

procmail_3.22-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/procmail/procmail_3.22-11.diff.gz
procmail_3.22-11.dsc
  to pool/main/p/procmail/procmail_3.22-11.dsc
procmail_3.22-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/procmail/procmail_3.22-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated procmail package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  1 Mar 2005 16:35:56 +0100
Source: procmail
Binary: procmail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.22-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 procmail   - Versatile e-mail processor
Closes: 236685 295604
Changes: 
 procmail (3.22-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Added Large File Support, using the output of "getconf LFS_CFLAGS".
     This will add -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 when the architecture needs it,
     and only when the architecture needs it (Closes: #236685).
   * Headers User-Agent: and NNTP-Posting-Date: are now recognized by formail
     when splitting messages (Closes: #295604).
Files: 
 8b88a43efb3256fb38cc94b4aa65a4fb 530 mail standard procmail_3.22-11.dsc
 dc073a968c177b5f56db16f672e6b82b 14166 mail standard procmail_3.22-11.diff.gz
 39d43141133352fa4c698cc0eadf8e1a 140108 mail standard procmail_3.22-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJIw7d9Uuvj7yPNYRAmveAJ470aul0m2zAwiOdl18Nw0iV4ZabQCfbJTY
kO0Avcvo4257XswKMWwUqR0=
=nqsy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to