Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:12:02 +0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 21:54:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 01 13:54:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from puntd4.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.105] (mirapoint)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6FJi-0003oq-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:54:10 -0800
Received: from daimyo.ucns.uga.edu (daimyo.ucns.uga.edu [128.192.6.234])
by puntd4.cc.uga.edu (MOS 3.5.4-GR)
with ESMTP id AWC11566 (AUTH via LOGINBEFORESMTP);
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:54:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from stuartf by daimyo.ucns.uga.edu with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D6FJd-0001UT-G0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:54:05 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stuart Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wordpress: Reports "Referer Sending" turned off even when it's on
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:54:05 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wordpress
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: important
When trying to use administrative functions wordpress fails saying that
referer sending is off. This appears to be a bug in
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-admin/admin-functions.php check_admin_referer().
This function compares the referer reported by mozilla-firefox 1.0+dfsg.1-6to
the $adminurl variable; $adminurl is http://localhost/wordpress/wp-admin and
$referer is http://localhost/wordpress/wp-admin/themes.php (or some other
administrative page). Of course the two don't match and the script complains.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages wordpress depends on:
ii apache2-mpm-worker [httpd] 2.0.53-5 high speed threaded model for Apac
ii libapache2-mod-php4 4:4.3.10-8 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii mysql-server 4.0.23-7 mysql database server binaries
ii php4 4:4.3.10-8 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii php4-mysql 4:4.3.10-8 MySQL module for php4
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 04:12:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 02 20:12:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi (mail.cs.helsinki.fi) [128.214.9.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D6hhR-0001P5-00; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:12:34 -0800
Received: from sbz-31.cs.Helsinki.FI (sbz-31.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.9.99])
(AUTH: PLAIN cs-relay, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
by mail.cs.helsinki.fi with esmtp; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:12:32 +0200
id 0008BC27.42268EB0.000077A2
Received: from sbz-31.cs.Helsinki.FI (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sbz-31.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j234COBQ019002
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:12:24 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
by sbz-31.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j234CNHH018997
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:12:23 +0200
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:12:02 +0700
From: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Upstream says not to worry, so I'l consider this not a bug. If you
Stuart think the bug is important, please reply with some extra
reasoning and information.
Best wishes,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
