Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:52:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299116: zile: /etc/alternatives
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 21:50:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 13:50:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sklave3.rackland.de [213.133.101.23]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9s1K-0007sx-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:50:10 -0800
Received: from andromeda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by sklave3.rackland.de (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with BSMTP id
j2BLo8sw011695;
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:50:08 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by andromeda.dresden.danisch.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Debian-15) id
j2BLkZoq026937;
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:46:35 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Hadmut Danisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: zile: /etc/alternatives
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.1
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:46:35 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: zile
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
zile should participate in the /etc/alternatives mechanism
for emacs.
regards
Hadmut
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-danisch-p4-intel
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages zile depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299116-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 14:52:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 06:52:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vll06-1-82-234-164-69.fbx.proxad.net (mail.duboc.info)
[82.234.164.69]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DA7z8-00019s-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:52:58 -0800
Received: from bilby.duboc.info (bilby.duboc.info [192.168.1.178])
by mail.duboc.info (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E2D0D7DC14; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:52:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bilby.duboc.info (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 972B44018F; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:52:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:52:29 +0100
From: Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hadmut Danisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#299116: zile: /etc/alternatives
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:46:35PM +0100, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> Package: zile
> Version: 2.0.2-1
> Severity: normal
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> zile should participate in the /etc/alternatives mechanism=20
> for emacs.
Zile is a light console text editor with an Emacs feel. But I think
its lake of major emacs features (such as elisp scriptability)
disqualifies it as an emacs alternative. Zile does not aim at being an
Emacs equivalent.
Note that, zile already participate in the alternatives mechanism for
'editor' which is more in sync with zile features.
I'm closing this bug. Feel free to reopen it if you strongly disagree,
we will then request an external and authoritative decision from other
Debian developers.=20
Thanks,
--=20
Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCMwItEAlStfgBp0MRAgorAJ0VWZMcwLQMmuMrQ7Ve7ZfWtdVnGACdFuaD
oqnRAK9nBqCAGoNjzoBjnAo=
=hE5o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
