Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:02:36 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299110: architecture-independent package using
Architecture: any
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 21:17:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 13:17:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c906374f.virtua.com.br (localhost) [201.6.55.79]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9rVt-00025S-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:17:42 -0800
Received: from gpastore by localhost with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1D9rVm-00030m-6B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:17:34 -0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: architecture-independent package using Architecture: any
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:17:34 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ewiki
Severity: serious
Hi,
The ewiki package violates Debian Policy, section 5.6.7[0].
As it's not architecture specific after the package build, it
should be 'Architecture: any' (insted of 'all').
By using 'any', you've used up much more mirror space than you
would have needed, used buildd time for no reason, etc =)
Hope this helps =)
Best regards,
--
Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[0]:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299110-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2005 21:00:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 13:00:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cartoon150.atarde.com.br (marighella.debian-ba.org)
[200.223.87.150]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DADj5-0005eN-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:00:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by marighella.debian-ba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023E9962B0;
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:00:38 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from marighella.debian-ba.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (marighella [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 23661-09; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:00:37 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by marighella.debian-ba.org (Postfix, from userid 10020)
id C43DB963CE; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:00:37 -0300 (BRT)
X-IMAP-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:02:36 -0300
X-OfflineIMAP-1476291118-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78:
1110661367-0151155354424-v4.0.8
From: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Guilherme de S. Pastore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#299110: architecture-independent package using Architecture:
any
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLfjTIIQuAzj8yil"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at debian-ba.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--SLfjTIIQuAzj8yil
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:41:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 299110 normal
> thanks
>=20
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:17:34PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
>=20
> > The ewiki package violates Debian Policy, section 5.6.7[0].
> > As it's not architecture specific after the package build, it
> > should be 'Architecture: any' (insted of 'all').
>=20
> > By using 'any', you've used up much more mirror space than you
> > would have needed, used buildd time for no reason, etc =3D)
>=20
> > Hope this helps =3D)
>=20
> This is neither a policy "must", nor an RC requirement for sarge, and is
> therefore not a 'serious' bug.
>=20
> --=20
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer
Fixed arch to all, thanks.
--SLfjTIIQuAzj8yil
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCM1js43hckmzCKKERAm/xAKCbK9cV0twXTGZc/vywLcuyi+ffigCffuq9
cQnHVNpXlLijWwmC4DWgz/g=
=eLlc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--SLfjTIIQuAzj8yil--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
