Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#179678: fixed in paketto 1.10-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2003 22:27:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 03 16:27:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.23] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18fp3d-0007xk-00; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:27:17 -0600
Received: from castor.cc.umanitoba.ca (castor.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.20])
by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h13MRDw0008507
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by castor.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.12.0/8.12.0) id h13MRDLC029226;
Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:27:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: paketto's description w/o nmap reference
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-DCC-UofM-Metrics: electra 1032; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: paketto's description w/o nmap reference
Package: paketto
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Description: "Unusual TCP/IP testing tools" is very vague and perhaps
incomplete. minewt seems to work with the ethernet protocol. Additionally,
it would be very helpful to mention it's port scanning capabilities which
are said to be better than nmap if it does what it was hyped to do on
packetstorm (and maybe slashdot).
Drew Daniels
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 179678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 17:11:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 09:11:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEsLW-0005Nz-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:11:42 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEsDn-00062n-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:43 -0500
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#179678: fixed in paketto 1.10-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:03:43 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: paketto
Source-Version: 1.10-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
paketto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
paketto_1.10-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/paketto/paketto_1.10-5.diff.gz
paketto_1.10-5.dsc
to pool/main/p/paketto/paketto_1.10-5.dsc
paketto_1.10-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/paketto/paketto_1.10-5_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated paketto
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:32:12 +0100
Source: paketto
Binary: paketto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
paketto - Unusual TCP/IP testing tools
Closes: 179678
Changes:
paketto (1.10-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.6.1.0, no change.
* Changed maintainer email address.
* Mention 'nmap' on the Description field. (Closes: #179678)
Files:
1441cdc3f99acfe0aa6d509111f2435c 583 net extra paketto_1.10-5.dsc
d50c5ec6e4de37e4565bad4501ac127f 18512 net extra paketto_1.10-5.diff.gz
625064d20bfb094645321b3cb8a6b04a 196784 net extra paketto_1.10-5_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCREAkxRSvjkukAcMRAuh0AJ9KOpav0OzaD6oAaNo2YunMyrDffgCfeKAR
dwn7mDt40oenT1Utcko5HZI=
=vVBp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
