Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:06:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done with latest upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 16:24:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 08:24:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (k2.js1.bogus) [64.214.127.138] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DBbKG-0001L1-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:24:52 -0800
Received: by k2.js1.bogus (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 98EED18138; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:24:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: by k2 (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000);
        Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:24:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:24:20 -0500 (EST)
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ntp cannot find user ntp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jiann-Ming Su <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ntp-server
Version: 4.2.0a+stable-2

Using kernel 2.6.9-3 on i386, I get the following error in syslog and
daemon.log when I run "/etc/init.d/ntp-server start":

  ntpd[11736]: Cannot find user `ntp'

However, on my Debian Alpha using 2.6.8-2-generic kernel, the ntp-server
works fine.  The Ubuntu users seem to be experiencing the same problem.

  http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-11464.html

Jiann-Ming Su
"Yeah, Lois, that'll be about as much fun as a lecture on
                                   ontological empiricism."  --Peter Griffin


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299799-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 19:07:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 11:07:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DFGd2-0007St-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:07:25 -0800
Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35] ident=mail)
        by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.44)
        id 1DFGbx-0004rj-Vr; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:06:29 +0100
Received: (nullmailer pid 24734 invoked by uid 501);
        Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:06:17 -0000
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:06:17 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done with latest upload
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bFsKbPszpzYNtEU6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Smurf-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Smurf-Whitelist: +relay_from_hosts
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--bFsKbPszpzYNtEU6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The latest upload resolves this bug (I closed near-duplicates in the
Changelog), or at leats should resolve it -- if the problem still
occurs after an update, please don't hesitate to reopen.

--=20
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--bFsKbPszpzYNtEU6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCRbKp8+hUANcKr/kRApOxAJ9CNfUU8KJsoZbvV1YoQ2ZqYXZFXwCgnv1U
KyURyEqQOKnTU2g97AwvVR4=
=f8Ie
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--bFsKbPszpzYNtEU6--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to