Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:15:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no need to keep it open
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 16:47:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 08:47:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFxP6-0003pr-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 08:47:52 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4D35794A0; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:45:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:45:43 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: patch on DHCP server setup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: package debian-installer-manual
Severity: wishlist
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:29:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi Geert,
Hello debian-boot mailinglist,
Hello Bug Tracking System users,
> On Friday 18 March 2005 23:06, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Attached you find a patch on the manual.
> > It is due evolution of the dhcp server.
> >
> > Is it to okay to commit into trunk of the d-i SVN tree?
>=20
> Have you actually checked that _all_ configuration examples (also those=
=20
> for tftp booting) that refer to dhcp are also valid for dhcp3?
That would mean there are several places in the _installer_ manual
how to set up a DHCP _server_ ?
> This is what has kept me back from making the change sooner.
This wishlist bug is to request a harmonisation to 1 single example
of the setup a DHCP server.
> Also AFAIK the dhcp package is not yet completely obsoleted. However, as=
=20
> Woody also contains dhcp3-server, I think this change in principle would=
=20
> be alright.
The "original" patch is commited.
There aren't changes in syntax / semantics in the examples d-i-m use.
(and DHCP server setup still will need site specific stuff)
>=20
> Cheers,
> Frans
>=20
> (P.S. I think it would be best to file all proposed patches as wishlist=
=20
> bugs instead of just sending them to the list. This to make sure they=20
> don't get lost. For the manual this is package debian-installer-manual.)
I see the importance of avoiding contributions getting lost.
I prefer "to talk" to people. Talking to "BTS" is some what strange to
me.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCSDS3OSINbgwa/7sRAkJSAJ9w2wViG2s7Afvootw0Lu3KrJ3CSgCgnd53
5BZ2fQhYuPCmKP2LPGwNwEA=
=QopC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301829-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 19:17:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 11:17:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl [213.84.119.166]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFzkF-0006lB-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:17:51 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C4309794A0; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:15:42 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: no need to keep it open
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
18:54 < fjp> stappers: Setting up DHCP is documented in one place, but there
are references to DHCP setup in the sections about boot servers.
18:55 < fjp> stappers: (as must have been clear from the comments in my reply
to your original patch)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
P.S.
Intented package was d-i manual
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCSFfeOSINbgwa/7sRAhnIAKCSytHMAz7YrqITeKrsxn+b8PsWVACgtItl
YsBeEH15mKP5HWSX3z8K26E=
=joA+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
