Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297061: fixed in blosxom 2.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 19:25:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 11:25:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-171-6-135.dsl.telesp.net.br (foolish.homelab.net)
[200.171.6.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D57Zb-0001Qy-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:25:55 -0800
Received: by foolish.homelab.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1215993B89; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:24:10 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2078465099=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: blosxom: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the attached debconf
template
translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:24:10 -0300
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============2078465099==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: blosxom
Version: 2.0-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Hello,
Please consider adding the attached Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf
template translation for the blosxom Debian package.
It was already checked against errors and no errors were found.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
pt_BR)
Versions of packages blosxom depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy
ii perl 5.8.4-6 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
--===============2078465099==
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pt_BR.po.gz"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--===============2078465099==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297061-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 17:30:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 09:30:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGKYH-0002Gl-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:30:53 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGKL0-0008D0-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#297061: fixed in blosxom 2.0-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: blosxom
Source-Version: 2.0-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
blosxom, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
blosxom_2.0-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10.diff.gz
blosxom_2.0-10.dsc
to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10.dsc
blosxom_2.0-10_all.deb
to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated blosxom package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:34:49 +0200
Source: blosxom
Binary: blosxom
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
blosxom - light, feature-packed weblog app with plugin extensibility
Closes: 230797 265021 297061
Changes:
blosxom (2.0-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
alfie:
* Really break blosxom, for the sake of a clean package for the release:
- Changed datadir to /var/lib/blosxom/data (closes: #230797)
- Changed plugin_dir to /etc/blosxom/plugins (closes: #265021)
- Save old plugins to /root/blosxom.XXXXXX to not loose them.
- Changed plugin_state_dir to /var/lib/blosxom/state
- Changed static_dir to /var/lib/blosxom/static
- Added critical debconf note about this all.
- Updated manual page with that information.
* Move DH_COMPAT level to debian/compat.
* Lowercased first letter of short description.
* Added pt_BR debconf translation from André Luís Lopes (closes: #297061)
* Fixed the most annoying flavour flaws, updated the URL.
Files:
5b18f90fd5ee54cfd5f35c028d959f82 614 web optional blosxom_2.0-10.dsc
9c15443a8d4ddc969e44b83c7b152ee0 14519 web optional blosxom_2.0-10.diff.gz
75d133bef73ca38bf63c7d461c3cb2c5 26398 web optional blosxom_2.0-10_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkJJby8ACgkQELuA/Ba9d8bNtwCcDe+wUTXZGY6edIoaLQADUzW7
1U4AnjL0O75eS3MP3lyHSfmI8rftXk65
=ho2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
