Your message dated Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:51:07 +0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Debian Bug report logs - #293071 iamerican: impune
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2005 23:44:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 15:44:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvlDc-00072m-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:44:34 -0800
Received: from tc218-187-83-14.2-7.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.83.14]:34023
helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.44 #0)
id 1CvlDa-000Byd-2K by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 05:14:30 +0530
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: iamerican: impune
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 0.5)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 05:06:04 +0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: iamerican
Severity: wishlist
These might be missing from ispell(1) and/or look(1):
impune
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293071-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 23:40:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 15:40:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DH9Gg-0007Yq-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:40:06 -0800
Received: from tc218-187-78-155.2-4.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.78.155]:33327
helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50 #1)
id 1DH9Gb-000D4H-Dm by authid <jidanni> with plain; Fri, 01 Apr 2005
05:10:02 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Debian Bug report logs - #293071 iamerican: impune
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:51:07 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hark! No I don't want to pollute the spell checker with that 1913 one,
thus letting mistakes pass by. OK, closing this bug. Maybe a warning
can be attached to the 1913 one. [Mom(Bcc): I corrected your article.]
>>>>> "Alfie" == Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfie> D. Jacobson wrote:
>> These might be missing from ispell(1) and/or look(1):
>> impune
Alfie> Pardon me, but did you mean "impugn"? If so, that's already in
Alfie> 'iamerican' -- "impune" looks like a misspelling of that, in
Alfie> which case this bug can be closed.
>> From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 [gcide]:
>>
>> Impugn \Im*pugn"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Impugned}; p. pr. & vb.
>> n. {Impugning}.] [OE. impugnen, F. impugner, fr. L.
>> impugnare; in on, against + pugnare to flight. See
>> {Pugnacious}.]
>> To attack by words or arguments; to contradict; to assail; to
>> call in question; to make insinuations against; to gainsay;
>> to oppose; as, to impugn a person's integrity.
>> [1913 Webster]
>>
>> The truth hereof I will not rashly impugn, or
>> overboldly affirm. --Peacham.
>> [1913 Webster]
Alfie> OTOH there is this:
>> Impune \Im*pune"\, a. [L. impunis.]
>> Unpunished. [R.]
>> [1913 Webster]
Alfie> ...but nobody ever uses it, it's a dead latinism. Including it
Alfie> might lead to letting misspellings of "impugn" slip by.
Alfie> That is, should a spellchecker dictionary be designed to find
Alfie> the most likely misspellings, or should it be an adjunct to an
Alfie> unabridged dictionary even if modern writing may suffer for it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
