Your message dated Wed, 3 Jan 2007 20:22:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fvwm95-icons
Version: 2.0.43ba-8
It appears that fvwm95 provides, to a great extent, many of the icons
provided also by the fvwm-common package, albeit with minor
modifications (although I am not sure which are newer), and in a
different location. It would make sense if these two packages could
be merged or similar to avoid a proliferation of slightly different
versions.
Also, I am hoping to investigate, when I have some time, how
fvwm-2.0.43 and fvwm95-2.0.43[ab] differ, with a possible view to
merging them together, preventing fvwm95 from falling further and
further behind FVWM's development. (Not that Windows 95 isn't....)
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-*- Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP public key. -*-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Removed - unmaintained; abandoned upstream.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
