Your message dated Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:15:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line don't associate mozilla-browser with lib*doc packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mozilla-browser
Version: 2:1.7.12-1
Severity: wishlist
I already installed firefox, mozilla-browser packages on my system.
mozilla-browser is heavy and not used any more by me. my main browser is
firefox. it was originated from mozilla source. but now they are
different as independant instance.
so when I decided to remove mozilla-browser, I found other documentation
packages depend on this package. although they contains HTML docs,
we can read them with other alternatives.(lynx, w3m, .., another
mozilla-based or independentties.)
I recommend to associate those doc packages with the virtual name
'www-browser' (so other users as well as I can choose and/or reduce
their disk space.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-oc15
Locale: LANG=ko_KR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ko_KR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libnspr4 2:1.7.12-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System printing extension
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii psmisc 21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages mozilla-browser recommends:
pn mozilla-psm <none> (no description available)
pn myspell-en-us | myspell-dicti <none> (no description available)
-- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jung-hoon Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Package: mozilla-browser
> Version: 2:1.7.12-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I already installed firefox, mozilla-browser packages on my system.
> mozilla-browser is heavy and not used any more by me. my main browser is
> firefox. it was originated from mozilla source. but now they are
> different as independant instance.
>
> so when I decided to remove mozilla-browser, I found other documentation
> packages depend on this package. although they contains HTML docs,
> we can read them with other alternatives.(lynx, w3m, .., another
> mozilla-based or independentties.)
>
> I recommend to associate those doc packages with the virtual name
> 'www-browser' (so other users as well as I can choose and/or reduce
> their disk space.)
This is no bug in mozilla itself but in the packages with the broken
dependencies. I am therefore closing this bug.
I am going to search for these broken packages using
grep-available -FDepends mozilla
and will individual file bug against these.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde
--- End Message ---
