Your message dated Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:08:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing forgotten bug reports for aptitude
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.8-1
Severity: minor
Hi guys,
We have a mistranslated report in APT recently, and I found these
translations aren't matched in aptitude, it is quite confusing our
users, any idea for jump out of this mess?
Please refer to apt's bug 218232
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=218232
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-cko3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3 0.5.27 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-1 Type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4.4-1
These bugs have all been fixed for a while but, for whatever reason,
were not properly closed.
I think that, now, the only remaining "l10n" bugs are those that are
yet to be fixed.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
