Your message dated Sun, 4 Feb 2007 13:52:57 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Funny error message: errno 0 (Sucess)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.0.10-6
Severity: minor
I got now some funny error messages during the start fo nfsd:
nfsd[8663]: nfssvc: writting fds to kernel failed: errno 0 (Success)
I think this message will confuse someone, please check carefully the
error codes.
This bug do not effect nfsd in any way as far as I can see!
Oliver
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcomer 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-1 common error description library
ii libgssap 0.10-4 A mechanism-switch gssapi library
ii libkrb53 1.4.4-6 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libnfsid 0.18-0 An nfs idmapping library
ii librpcse 0.14-2 allows secure rpc communication us
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-12 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii lsb-base 3.1-23 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii nfs-comm 1:1.0.10-6 NFS support files common to client
ii ucf 2.0018.1 Update Configuration File: preserv
nfs-kernel-server recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:23:20PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> Use strace -vff or similar. But yes, it looks like it's coming from rpc.nfsd;
>> there are two different lines capable of emitting that message, though. The
>> "success" thing is a bit of a misnomer; the write was short, but not
>> completely failed. The strace should tell how much was attempted written and
>> how much was actually written...
> Any progress on this?
As there's been no process for about a week, and I believe this is a problem
of your kernel anyhow, I'm talking the liberty to close this bug. Please
reopen it if you can provide enough information that it's actually possible
to track down, or if you see it on more than one machine :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--- End Message ---
