Your message dated Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:58:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#203355: libgtk2.0-dev: Order of
gtk_tree_view_column_pack_start & gtk_tree_view_column_set_cell_data_func
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgtk2.0-dev
Version: 2.2.1-4
Severity: normal
If gtk_tree_view_column_set_cell_data_func() is called before the column is
packed into tree view (by gtk_tree_view_column_pack_start()), it produces
an assertion failure.
The problem is that order of calling these functions is not (at least
noticeably) documented and so it is hard to guess the reason of the
failure. Please allow any order of calling or at least document.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux home.porton.narod.ru 2.4.17 #2 Thu Feb 27 18:06:13 YEKT 2003
i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R
Versions of packages libgtk2.0-dev depends on:
ii libatk1.0-dev 1.2.3-1 Development files for the ATK
acce
ii libglib2.0-dev 2.2.1-3 Development files for the GLib
lib
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.2.1-4 The GTK+ graphical user
interface
ii libpango1.0-dev 1.2.1-3 Development files for the Pango
ii pkg-config 0.15.0-2 Manage compile and link flags
for
ii xlibs-dev 4.2.1-3 X Window System client library
dev
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I agree with Akira TAGOH. More generally, a lot of things are not
> directly said in the GTK documentation, and you need to read tutorials
> to understand complex topics such as trees in GTK. If you're ok with
> this fact, I'll close this bug or mark it as wontfix.
(I'm closing this bug.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- End Message ---
