Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:47:17 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#277394: fixed in kernel-patch-vserver 1.9.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2004 20:52:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 13:52:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from oola.is.scarlet.be [193.74.71.23]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CK0xx-0004BC-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:52:21 -0700
Received: from (u81-11-135-231.adsl.scarlet.be [81.11.135.231])
by oola.is.scarlet.be with ESMTP id i9JKqIY10191
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:52:18 +0200
Received: from eran by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1CK10F-0003LD-8X; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:54:57 +0200
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:54:43 +0200
From: Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
X-Operating-System: Tiny Tux
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: 53B9 972E C2E6 B93C BEAD 7092 09E6 AF46 51D0 5641
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Gilles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel-patch-ctx: Outdated patch and utilities
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-patch-ctx
Version: 1:1.29-2
Severity: important
Hello.
According to the developers of the vserver project, the kernel patch,
and tools, are rather outdated, and unsuitable for use with a 2.6.x kernel.
Here is some of the answer I got to a post to their mailing-list:
---BEGIN-TRANSCRIPT---
> I was just about to post a request for help about 2.6.x.
>
> I use Debian testing/unstable and the following deb packages:
> - kernel-package (to patch/compile new kernels: currently, 2.6.6)
outdated.
> - vserver patch (ctx) 1:1.29-2
outdated
> - util-vserver 0.30-8
outdated for 2.6 (use 0.30.195 instead)
> - vserver-debiantools 0.1.4
don't know what that is ...
> I had created vservers under kernel 2.4.25: the only things I changed from
> the "default" config were the name and IP address (no "capability" added or
> removed).
>
> Now I have to run kernel 2.6.
[...]
> I want to switch to a more recent kernel, but there is no Debian follow-up for
> the "ctx" patch. :-{ The Debian-provided patch is meant for kernel 2.6.6
> only.
please bug the debian maintainers ...
> Is there some reason for this?
don't know, not a linux-vserver issue ...
> Should I make a new kernel from the "vanilla" source, thus
> ceasing to use the kernel-package tools?
would be certainly advised as long as the debian
folks do not update/maintain their packages ...
---END-TRANSCRIPT---
Thanks and best regards,
Gilles
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (1002, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6+g3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kernel-patch-ctx depends on:
ii bash 2.05b-15 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii grep-dctrl 2.1.3 Grep Debian package information
ii patch 2.5.9-1 Apply a diff file to an original
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277394-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 19:01:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 12:01:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJFmO-0004o3-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:01:32 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJFYb-0001eC-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:47:17 -0400
From: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#277394: fixed in kernel-patch-vserver 1.9.5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:47:17 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: kernel-patch-vserver
Source-Version: 1.9.5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-patch-vserver, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.dsc
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-vserver/kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.dsc
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-vserver/kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.tar.gz
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-vserver/kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kernel-patch-vserver
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:02:10 -0500
Source: kernel-patch-vserver
Binary: kernel-patch-vserver
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-patch-vserver - virtual private servers and security contexts kernel
patch
Closes: 277394
Changes:
kernel-patch-vserver (1.9.5) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Added myself to Uploaders at maintainer's approval
* New upstream patch (modified to work for Debian kernels)
for 2.6.11.5 and 2.6.11.6 (Closes: #277394)
* Added Suggests on kernel-source being distributed with Sarge
* Updated kernel-patch-vserver.kpatches.vserver for 2.6.11 to have newest
patch, as well as remove unsupported old kernels (this enables the
make-kpkg --added-patches work properly again)
* Updated README.Debian to have new package name and to fix a grammar error
* Changed revision to remove lintian error on native package containing a
dash version
Files:
de97290d1081528271b49b29d21a16ef 630 devel optional
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.dsc
3e654d0d0bb787039ce71f677d82bd1f 867489 devel optional
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5.tar.gz
4e070bf1aed002b6bf620708c940727c 354106 devel optional
kernel-patch-vserver_1.9.5_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCVCrh9n4qXRzy1ioRAroVAJ92BHAFTllnTliXVtsAlqByXMICbACfaFDF
YATcLmWPSe7Fs2GzNbqGLjA=
=HgTH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
