Your message dated Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:05:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing; reopen if it reappears
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
While I write this,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=tetex-bin&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
displays, among others, the following information:
Outstanding bugs -- Grave functionality bugs; Unclassified (3 bugs)
* #334613: tetex-bin: fmtutil-sys fails during package package setup
Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-9); Severity: grave; Reported by:
Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* #334701: can't install tetex-bin 2.0.2-31 due to
/usr/share/man/man1/texi2pdf.1.gz
Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 2.0.2-31); Severity: grave; Reported by:
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
* #334713: tetex-bin: package doesn't install because of missing mfw binary
Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-9); Severity: grave; Reported by:
Florian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Outstanding bugs -- Serious policy violations; Unclassified (1 bug)
* #334005: builds libkpathsea3 which is also built by libkpathsea3
Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 2.0.2-31; fixed: tetex-bin 3.0-9);
Severity: serious; Reported by: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Done: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Will be archived in 27 days.
The last of the bugs above (#334005) is marked as fixed and "will be
archived", but because of this it should *not* be displayed as
outstanding, but as "Resolved".
The second of these bugs (#334701) has been reported on an unstable
system while for this particular system 2.0.2-31 was still available,
but at a time where the Debian archive contained the buggy version only
in testing, not in unstable (which has 3.0-9). This was somewhen between
late Tuesday and early Wednesday. I think this bug should not be
displayed on the bugs page for unstable.
Furthermore,
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Since this hasn't been seen in a while, I'm closing this report. If it
recurs, reopen.
Don Armstrong
--
Physics is like sex. Sure, it may give some practical results, but
that's not why we do it.
-- Richard Feynman
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--- End Message ---
