Your message dated Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:02:32 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Buildd indicates this bug can be closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2004 22:49:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 11 16:49:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Afiwz-0007cq-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:00:33 -0600
Received: (qmail 22509 invoked by uid 1013); 11 Jan 2004 17:00:04 -0000
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:00:04 +0100
From: Javier =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libnasl: Fails to build in ia64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libnasl
Version: 2.0.9-1
Priority: normal
libnasl is not getting built in ia64 and has not yet progressed into=20
testing (notice that other nessus 2.0.9 packages have). This is holding off=
=20
nessus-core 2.0.9 from getting into testing too.
The following logs should be reviewed further:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=3Dia64&pkg=3Dlibnasl&ver=3D2.0.9-1
For what I can infer from those logs (Dec 27 01:56, Dec 21 17:35 and Jan 8
14:02) the problem appears when running tex4ht (i.e. htlatex). However=20
this does not happen in other arquitectures (sparc and mips, at least).=20
This can be a bug in tex4ht itself but it could maybe be related to the way=
=20
htlatex is called (no options at all) and could be avoided if HTML=20
documentation was not produced (which might be the sensible approach if=20
this bug is not fixed near the release).
Regards
Javi
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAAYEUsandgtyBSwkRAmj6AJ9Qhtw+XFCdYTGv11hebc13PvvatACfQlFG
NFq71obisaqmpnQX+yktBuU=
=rbKV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227178-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 04:33:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 21:33:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2.imsc.res.in [203.199.209.87]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJOhW-0002MI-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:33:06 -0700
Received: from [172.16.1.76] (helo=banyan.imsc.res.in)
by mail2.imsc.res.in with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DJOrY-0001BA-UT
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:13:28 +0530
Received: from [172.16.2.107] (helo=as82.imsc.res.in)
by banyan.imsc.res.in with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1DJOgz-0008DJ-FE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:02:33 +0530
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:02:32 +0530
From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Buildd indicates this bug can be closed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
According to the buildd logs, the newer version of darcs
builds its docs correctly on ia64 using the newer version
of tex4ht.
The newer version of libnasl does not use tex4ht to generate its
documentation.
The former indicates that tex4ht works as expected on ia64 so
I am closing this bug.=20
Thanks and regards,
Kapil.
--=20
http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/gpg.html for my Public Key.
------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/5416E5B8 2004-10-13 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1024g/3BDF565B 2004-10-13
Key fingerprint =3D F160 CBB9 03C8 425D 4BBA 79F4 491F 8FDA 5416 E5B8
--
--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCVLfgSR+P2lQW5bgRArn3AKC+XTG0Non9By3Aqn+/f4GCCbf7XwCgqXFM
iVIkgm6K76XI6TBoef1kat4=
=eZw+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
